the BMB

Login for message boards, profiles, and preferences.

porters review videos - inquiry

Last post 08-07-2009, 2:15 PM by Mr_Tidbit. 23 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (24 items)   1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  08-06-2009, 4:58 AM 832191

    porters review videos - inquiry

    so i putt around youtube all the time, and i often watch these porters review videos just for the hell of it.  if youve seen the newer ones, you know they give the board a terrain category at the beginning of the video with the little arrow.  something ive noticed is the "jump" category, and ive seen a lot of the great all around park/freestyle/anything boards go in there, rather than at least just "all mountain," or have a "park" category or something.  what does a "jump" board even mean?

    chappy?
  •  08-06-2009, 6:11 AM 832195 in reply to 832191

    • lovechase is not online. Last active: 09-07-2009, 5:00 AM lovechase
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on
      07-28-2009
    • Brisbane, Australia

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    i always click play on their reviews, blink and i miss them!

    but on the jump thing, nfi jump/jib = park makes sense just to have that.
  •  08-06-2009, 3:58 PM 832352 in reply to 832191

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    Spenser?:
    so i putt around youtube all the time, and i often watch these porters review videos just for the hell of it.  if youve seen the newer ones, you know they give the board a terrain category at the beginning of the video with the little arrow.  something ive noticed is the "jump" category, and ive seen a lot of the great all around park/freestyle/anything boards go in there, rather than at least just "all mountain," or have a "park" category or something.  what does a "jump" board even mean?

    chappy?

    Hey Spenser et al -

    I agree with the critique and was already going to have them re-tagged / changed. 

    Let me back up though first.  While I personally don't like narrowing types of boards down too much in categories, unfortunately a lot of customers "like" that and need their hand held to pick out models.  I also am not a fan of calling boards "freestyle" or "freeride" for obvious reasons......as any rider worth a hoot can "freestyle" a freeride board or "freeride" a freestyle one on any type of terrain anywhere on the mountain.

    So last season we had park, all terrain, and powder as the categories of boards.  This season, with there being so many rockered boards out there, we duplicated all three of those generic types of boards for rocker.  So, for example, you could have "all terrain" as a category.....as well as "all terrain rockered".

    Here's where the next wrinkle got thrown in......and this was consistent feedback from people on our live chat again who wanted more detail.  The word "park" was too broad as we got people complaining / wanting to return boards that were too soft.....i.e. soft jib sticks that really are best on rails and boxes.  So we thought why not put those noodles in their own category?

    However, for a while internally with our peeps working on the videos, the terms "park jib" and "park jumps" started getting used.  Then some of the videos got tagged with that when really, in my opinion, it should just be called "park" boards as the vast amount.....and a handful called "park jib" or something.

    Bottom line, here's what's on the table now:

     

    All Terrain

    All Terrain - Rocker

    Park - Jib

    Park - Jib Rocker

    Park

    Park - Rocker

    Powder

    Powder - Rocker

     

    As with anything, though, the more you narrow it down, the more open to interpretation crap gets.  Again I personally could categorize 90% of boards as "all mountain / all terrain".....with a few noodle jib sticks and a few very directional / tapered boards rounding out the rest.

    Thoughts Spenser?  Too confusing?  Feedback from other peeps?  And again I agree that the little meter thing was a nice thought but it's gotta be changed regardless.....

     

    Edit:  and to make a long story short on the "jump" deal......that word should just be "park" instead of jump of course

     

  •  08-06-2009, 4:42 PM 832362 in reply to 832352

    • drjcv is not online. Last active: 11-19-2009, 4:55 PM drjcv
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on
      08-01-2006
    • http://easyloungin.com/forum

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    i  think it should be

     

    skatestyle

    skatestyle rockers

    freestyle

    freestyle/rockerd

    freeride

    freeride rockerd

    latex

    paba free

    organic

    organic/rockered

  •  08-06-2009, 4:47 PM 832364 in reply to 832362

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    doc....I think you missed "con carne"
  •  08-06-2009, 4:53 PM 832366 in reply to 832364

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    Oh....and I also forgot to mention one other very big benefit by at least separating out rocker boards.  People do Google searches by general categories like "rockered snowboards".....and if we have a standalone category for that it helps with organic SEO.

    Not sure if you were serious with "skate style", but ironically that's one term that we've been thinking of using instead of the "park / jib / rails / boxes / whatever"

    Forgetting rocker as a subset for now, would you be more inclined to say screw trying to separate out the more skate / jib park boards from the bigger generic "park" category?

    Leaving you back with just 3 general categories....

    1)  all terrain (again the vast majority of boards)

    2)  park

    3)  powder

    ??

  •  08-06-2009, 5:38 PM 832383 in reply to 832366

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    definitely powder or maybe powder/freeride (taper, mainly, like your fish/malolo/etc board) and all mountain, like your custom, uninc, and more aggressive ones like the CX and maybe t6, etc.. and between there and your super jibby boards is where it gets tough.  like an indoor for example.. true twin, so you think its a good all around park board, but obviously they work great as all mountain boards as well.  i think like you said, people like to have that category there because it helps some people make up their mind when they dont really think like you or me or doc for example, where we know any half decent rider will be able to shred anything with your general board whether its true twin or not, from park and rails to pow on the real mountain.

    so at the bottom of the lineup, you could definitely have park/jib, like your horrorscope, WWW, and so on, and then when you get more toward a higher end medium stiff park board like an indoor or twin or fix or something, youd have to somehow blend it between all-around park and all mountain somehow.  what do you think of maybe even having two arrows?  sounds weird at first, but it could work.

    ps - replied to your pm about something else
  •  08-06-2009, 6:08 PM 832405 in reply to 832383

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    Thanks for the feedback......but in all honesty the rocker distinction (especially for SEO) is more important than some of these other distinctions.

    So I'm more and more tempted to just go back to 3 more generic categories since we'd have to double that to 6 already with a corresponding rockered / flat category for each.

    Eeeeeegads

    pm'd back

  •  08-06-2009, 6:20 PM 832411 in reply to 832405

    • drjcv is not online. Last active: 11-19-2009, 4:55 PM drjcv
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on
      08-01-2006
    • http://easyloungin.com/forum

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    in all seriousness i would do

    jib oriented c/co rocker

    park oriented c/co rocker

    all mountain freestyle oriented c/co rocker

    freeride oreinted c/co rocker

    powder c/co rocker

    i think this leaves it open that all boards can doeverything but some are more designed around a type of riding

    c/co = with/without

  •  08-06-2009, 6:23 PM 832413 in reply to 832366

    • J-T is not online. Last active: 08-15-2009, 3:43 AM J-T
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on
      10-16-2008

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    do the broad categories and then have subsets if needed or where appropriate

                     > - Jib
    Park- >
                     > -Jump

                           >more park
    All terrain->
                           >more pow

                           > big mountain
    Freeride->
                           >tree riding

    Freeriding subsets would probably be overkill....and even all terrain, park is the only thing that really needs a distinction because boards can vary so much.

    Adding more categories would also mean more templates which equals more work. May not be worth it.

    Chappy, do you guys do meta-keyword permutations?
  •  08-06-2009, 6:43 PM 832425 in reply to 832411

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    drjcv:

    in all seriousness i would do

    jib oriented c/co rocker

    park oriented c/co rocker

    all mountain freestyle oriented c/co rocker

    freeride oreinted c/co rocker

    powder c/co rocker

    i think this leaves it open that all boards can doeverything but some are more designed around a type of riding

    c/co = with/without

    In all seriousness too.....appreciate the feedback for sure

  •  08-06-2009, 6:45 PM 832426 in reply to 832413

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    J-T:
    do you guys do meta-keyword permutations?

    Even though meta tags don't carry the SEO weight that they used to, yes we still use them.  Any particular reason why you're curious?

  •  08-06-2009, 7:29 PM 832434 in reply to 832411

    • Junkshow is not online. Last active: 11-17-2009, 11:31 AM Junkshow
    • Top 100 Contributor
    • Joined on
      06-13-2008
    • Creepy Gaper and a Kook

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    drjcv:

    in all seriousness i would do

    jib oriented c/co rocker

    park oriented c/co rocker

    all mountain freestyle oriented c/co rocker

    freeride oreinted c/co rocker

    powder c/co rocker

    i think this leaves it open that all boards can doeverything but some are more designed around a type of riding

    c/co = with/without

     

    This and J-Ts seem to make the most sense to me.

  •  08-06-2009, 9:28 PM 832494 in reply to 832426

    • J-T is not online. Last active: 08-15-2009, 3:43 AM J-T
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on
      10-16-2008

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    TahoeChappy:

    J-T:
    do you guys do meta-keyword permutations?

    Even though meta tags don't carry the SEO weight that they used to, yes we still use them.  Any particular reason why you're curious?



    I have been working at a company that does this type of stuff, and I just wanted to see how far Porters went in comparison....just out of interest.
  •  08-06-2009, 9:50 PM 832508 in reply to 832494

    Re: porters review videos - inquiry

    Like an SEO optimization type company.....or some other online retailer and you're working in the marketing / SEO division?  Just curious too...

Page 1 of 2 (24 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML